Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Positive Fur Review - Screendaily, from Nicolefan17
friendlyfox
post Oct 11 2006, 05:16 AM
Post #1


Nine (2009)
******


Posts: 7,851





More on Fur from nicolefan17.This time a positive review of Fur Thanks nicolefan17 rose4.gif


Fur: An Imaginary Portrait Of Diane Arbus


Mike Goodridge in Los Angeles 09 October 2006



Dir: Steven Shainberg. US. 2006. 122mins.

A surprising and seductive curio from Secretary director Steven Shainberg, Fur is one of the season’s most unusual films. On the one hand, its high-calibre cast led by Nicole Kidman and Robert Downey Jr screams of prestige awards contender, while on the other its unconventional pacing, largely fictional story about the iconic Arbus and decidedly bizarre characters mark it out as a cult item which will infuriate as many as it enchants.

Fur already divided opinion when it had its world premiere screening at Telluride last month, although European audiences will probably be more favourable than those in the US when it has its international premiere as the opening night film of the inaugural Rome International Film Festival this week. Budgeted in the $12m region, it is a pricey specialised item, and the producers will be counting on the two star names to ensure payback in theatres and ancillary markets around the world.

The film, as the title makes very clear, is not a biopic of Arbus, the legendary photographer most famous for her portraits of life’s outsiders like dwarves, transvestites and prostitutes. It is, as the opening title card explains, “a film that invents characters and situations that reach beyond reality to express what might have been Arbus’ inner experience on her extraordinary path.”

In other words, Shainberg and his Secretary screenwriter Wilson have invented a story which might explain how Arbus went from a housewife, mother and the daughter of a wealthy New York family to become an artist, and how indeed she got to the point of leaving her husband.

The film, set in 1958, starts as a small fashion show takes place at the fancy New York apartment owned by Allan Arbus, a fashion and advertising photographer, and his wife Diane, who is his assistant. The show is for the latest furs from Russek’s, the Fifth Avenue fur store run by Diane’s imperious parents – her father (Yulin) and mother (Alexander). While Allan oversees the models, Diane buckles under the stress of her parents’ scrutiny and rushes out to the balcony where she instinctively unleashes her cleavage in full view of the neighbouring building.

Her hunger for adventure and curiosity for life outside her repressed existence are further awakened when she observes the arrival of her new upstairs neighbour Lionel (Downey Jr) whose face is concealed by a mask and scarf.

Over the following days, Diane becomes fascinated by Lionel and eventually dares to walk up to his apartment, armed with the camera which her husband bought her years before and which she has never used. On the promise that she wants to photograph him, she is invited in by Lionel, still masked, and the two embark on a friendship.

Lionel, it emerges, has an illness which means that he is covered in abundant hair from head to toe. His face is covered in hair, apart from his eyes, which penetrate deep into Diane’s soul. Regardless of his condition, Diane is mesmerised and she abandons all scruples as he introduces her into a netherworld peopled by those living on the fringes of society as she knows it – conjoined twins, dwarves, drag queens, giants and so on.

Diane starts neglecting her family, staying out night after night as Lionel shows her the other side of New York. She tries to bring Allan into her new circle, but he resists, leaving the path open for Diane to fall in love with Lionel.

The film’s portrayal of Arbus’ creative awakening is nothing more than fantasy, but it is an effective conceit which not only captures the direction of her future photography but also rather beautifully illustrates the soul of its characters beyond physical idiosyncrasies.

Shainberg deliberately paces the film like a dream, and mainstream audiences used to fast cutting and short scenes will be shuffling in their seats. Fortunately the two lead actors are so persuasive that the dreamlike journey of Arbus in the film becomes equally persuasive. When Diane starts shaving Lionel’s body hair and confessing her love for him, even as he himself is telling her of his impending death, the film has convincingly morphed from a “what if” whimsy to a genuinely affecting love story.

Kidman, once again demonstrating her impulse to take on unusual projects and characters, splendidly and subtly embodies the seachange in Diane, while Downey Jr, in one of the most challenging roles of his career, is captivating as Lionel. Even though he spends most of the film covered in hair, the actor hypnotizes Arbus and the screen with just his eyes.

Production companies
River Road Entertainment
Edward R Pressman Film Corp
Iron Films
Vox3 Films

US distribution
Picturehouse

International sales
New Line International

Executive producers
Edward R Pressman
Alessandro Camon
Michael Roban

Producers
William Pohlad
Laura Bickford
Bonnie Timmermann
Andrew Fierberg

Screenplay
Erin Cressida Wilson
Inspired by the book Diane Arbus: A Biography by Patricia Bosworth

Cinematography
Bill Pope

Production designer
Amy Danger

Editors
Keiko Deguchi
Kristina Boden

Music
Carter Burwell

Main cast
Nicole Kidman
Robert Downey Jr
Ty Burrell
Harris Yulin
Jane Alexander
Emmy Clarke
Genevieve McCarthy


ScreenDaily.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
katekidman
post Oct 11 2006, 06:23 AM
Post #2


To Die For(1995)
***


Posts: 433





thanks Foxy and Nicolefan17! that was awesome! = ) lots of love xoox


--------------------
All you need is love.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kiha
post Oct 11 2006, 09:57 AM
Post #3


The Golden Compass (2007)
*****


Posts: 3,326





Thanks Foxy happy.gif


--------------------
Where do you consider home "In My Husbands Arms" Nicole Kidman Urban 2007

Where is home to you "Wherever My Wife Is" Keith Urban 2007
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bluebell
post Oct 11 2006, 10:57 AM
Post #4


Nine (2009)
******


Posts: 6,057





Thank you! happy.gif


--------------------
"We're Progress Not Perfection." - Keith Urban
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nicole
post Oct 11 2006, 11:25 AM
Post #5


Margot At The Wedding (2007)
*****


Posts: 2,294





Thanks foxy and Nicolefan17. That review is good to hear. huggle.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sanja
post Oct 11 2006, 11:42 AM
Post #6


Nine (2009)
******


Posts: 7,046





Thank you! rose4.gif


--------------------
I see invisible moment in every town
Every cry is a separate emotion
Happenings are planned
And then they arrive
They go on with or without you there...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedSatinDoll
post Oct 11 2006, 01:48 AM
Post #7


Margot At The Wedding (2007)
*****


Posts: 2,907





Thanks nicfan and Foxy! Every review I read - positive or negative, and this one captures some of the subtle eroticism of the trailer - merely confirms that this is a film I MUST see.

So $12mil (I assume US dollars) is a "pricey specialized item"? How much did The Hours cost? I thought $12mil was chump-change in the film world today, when budgets are averaging at $70mil and up. I have no doubt that the $12mil will be made back in the European and international market if not the US one. (On the other hand, I suppose the $12mil at least partly explains the lack of promotion - not much money for it.) And certainly if it's true that, as a theater owner recently told me, "the theatrical releases nowadays are just advertisements for the DVD's" then the studio will make it's money back one way or another - DVD's are not expensive to mass-produce, I understand.

It's odd actually, now that I think of it *here I go again* that promotion is such a huge part of the film industry and the whole process of selling a film. It seems to me that back in the '70's, say, when I was first becoming aware of films, it was more a matter of getting the films out there and letting them time to find their audience.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
TexasKUFAN
post Oct 11 2006, 01:54 AM
Post #8


The Golden Compass (2007)
*****


Posts: 3,223





Thanks nicolefan17 and foxy clap.gif clap.gif

hugs.gif


--------------------
TexasKUFan

God Bless Keith and Nicole
It'a a love thing.........
Houston,Tx04
Dallas,Tx 04
BatonRouge,La05
KUFanClubParty05 Nashville!
PremireDVD 05
Waco,TxFeb3rd06
Atlanta-Oct 1st 06
Austin/Houston/DallasTx 07
Houston, 08 & 09
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BabyNick
post Oct 11 2006, 02:14 AM
Post #9


Australia (2008)
******


Posts: 3,689





Thanx Nicolefan17 and Foxy 4 da review huggle.gif

tongue.gif ~Viviana~ tongue.gif


--------------------
"Move foward one day @ a time, keep smiling & remember that 2morrow is another day"

"Sticks & Stone might break your bones but names will never hurt u"

"Honk If Ya Love Nicole" *honk honk*

*~*ßàßÿ NïÇķ*~*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nicolefan19
post Oct 11 2006, 03:18 AM
Post #10


Days Of Thunder(1990)
***


Posts: 168





Darn, I just posted this in the "Yet another Fur review" thread. Oh well, I also posted this semi-review as well, by David Thomson from The Independent.

QUOTE
Rome Film Festival: Kidman & Arbus
Rome's new film festival gets under way with a controversial 'biography' of the photographer
By David Thomson
Published: 08 October 2006
Rome stages its first film festival this week, in a direct challenge to the annual Venice jamboree, and its choice of opening presentation shows every readiness to go for the sensational, the unexpected, the daring.

The film chosen was until recently known simply as Fur. It has picked up a subtitle, "An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus", a placatory gesture that will serve no purpose. A lot of people - starting with the family of the late controversial photographer - will be outraged by the complete abandonment of biographical fact.

Biography, however, is a strange art (I write as the author of a recent book on Nicole Kidman, who plays the imaginary Diane Arbus). Sometimes the front door is the last place to enter; buildings have their own private nooks and crannies.

Fur opens in New York City in 1958. Diane and Allan Arbus live together with their two children. Allan is a professional photographer, and one of his main jobs every year is to photograph the new collections of furs produced by the firm run by Diane's parents. We see that fashion show, and it's clear that Diane, its organiser, is a nervous wreck, caught between demanding parents and a rather cool husband.

As Kidman presents her, Diane is at first a classic portrait of a 1950s wife and mother who has no life of her own. A few people ask Diane in a kindly way what she photographs, and she cannot admit to anything. You feel she is headed for a nervous breakdown.

One day there are violent noises from the apartment upstairs as a new tenant moves in. Diane is curious, and at night thinks she sees a masked man upstairs watching her. A kind of subtle attraction develops between them - it could be love, it could be the start of a horror story.

It bears no relation to anything that ever happened in the life of the real Diane Arbus, but it is the basis of a great film.

The man upstairs, named Lionel, is played by Robert Downey Jr. He is among the most enigmatic, charming, wise and amusing men we've met in a film for a long time. And hair grows all over his body: you might call it fur.

Like a little girl in a very grave fairy story, Arbus musters the courage to go upstairs to see Lionel. It's the start of a rare friendship. Bit by bit, he opens her up. It's not so much the sex or the shaving (you'll have to see for yourself) as the general education he provides.

You see, Lionel has friends - transsexuals, giants, dwarfs, freaks. What do you expect in a film that - imaginatively - is going to try to show you how Arbus became herself? Upstairs, she finds out what it is she needs to photograph. None of this ever happened, yet there it is on screen in Fur as large as life - and as mysterious and touching as it is beautiful.

Kidman doesn't look like Arbus, but the world she discovers does look like the Arbus work we know. The film will be argued over fiercely. You see, there are so many ways of turning the raw skin of life into the fur coat called biography.

For Kidman, this is another of her very brave films. For Downey, it is another sign of genius. And for Rome, it is a terrific start.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RedSatinDoll
post Oct 11 2006, 10:59 PM
Post #11


Margot At The Wedding (2007)
*****


Posts: 2,907





QUOTE(nicolefan19 @ Oct 10 2006, 01:18 PM)
Darn, I just posted this in the "Yet another Fur review" thread. Oh well, I also posted this semi-review as well, by David Thomson from The Independent.
*


Thanks Nicolefan19. An interesting read - Thomson is at his best in small doses for me. (I notice he can't help popping in what in fanfiction would be called a *shameless plug* at every opportunity.)

I very much like this sentence: "You see there are so many ways of turning the raw skin of life into the fur coat called biography." That's brilliant.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd November 2009 - 11:28 AM