These look like STILLS to me, I am trying to find out if other sites have them i.e. if Picturehouse released them or if they are very good set pics taken by the paparazzi like the many we had last year but for now I think they are FILM STILLS



NK and Ty Burrell, who plays her husband:


NK and Robert Downey Jr.:




This last one is of Jane Alexander, who plays the mother and Harris Yulin:




http://www.cinempire.com/films/news/10027.html

Steven Shainberg:

thank you.Nic is so beautiful, mainly in the first pic with the kids.

I'm very excited about this film, i have a huge hope about another oscar nomination.Nic is great in biopic films.

She has only done one "biopic" film and that was only for 30mins .

O.......M.......G!

They look like stills! Finally, I was waiting for some new ones!

Ugh, this looks so good! The one with Nic and the kids(I'm guessing they play her children) is so cute!!

thank you, she is so cute, we wait now the first teaser

OH MYYY GOOOOOOD!!!!!!!
THANKS SKANKY!!!!!

SHE WILL WON HER SECOND OSCAR WITH THIS MOVIE....
I'M SURE OF THIS!!!

From these shots, it looks like a very good movie to me. 'Hope they'll show the movie soon. Thanks skanky.

Nicole Fan 17:
"The one with Nic and the kids(I'm guessing they play her children) is so cute!! "

Diane Arbus had two children, both girls. These children may be her brother Howard's or alternatively her sister Renee's children.

I'm impatiently waiting for Fur to hit the film festivals...hope it's soon.

Thanks skanky for posting these pics

They're all lovely, even if they're stills or pictures taken by papparazzis. The first one is beautiful, Nicole there with a smile on her face next to the two kids. Robert Downey Jr. looks very much into the role in the other photo. Thanks for the additions skanky.

Luv,
Marie Xx

Those photos are so lovely! Thanks so much, skankyoldwhore! You rock!

She looks great!!! i want to see this movie rigth now!!!
thank you!!!!!

Thanks for the stills, amazing!!!

Thanks so much for these skanky. The first one is new scene altogether and the first 3 and last one are new for sure.

Thanks Skanky .

The first one definitely looks like a studio still.

Thanks!!
I want to see the movie too!

Oh thank you so much for those beautiful pics.

Nic looks as always adorable with brunette hair and those cute dresses that flatter her figure so much... Oh it´s beautiful she has children in this movie, I always love that. And I also hope it will be released some time soon!!!

ThanksSkany!

I love the first one with the kids. So cute.

Thanks skanky! Love the way she looks in the first one - I wonder if the Fur site has been updated? (*runs off to check*)

Thanks skanky! I have one more joy when coming back to the KU after a short vacation. I put my trust in this film .

Thanks, Skanky! I can't wait for this film to come out. They definitely look like stills to me.

Thanks a lot...
ciao

Photos are beautiful. Nicole looks amazing. Good premise for the trailer.

LOL, I have been checking every single day.

Nothing yet.

hi! this is my first post (i feel so ashamed as i've been to this board a million times and everyone's so active). anyway, i just have to say that i love the fourth pic. it's very hitchcock-ian, sort of mysterious and quite magical (not in a completely fantastical sense). she looks gorgeous- as always! i also want to say that this board has the most positive people ever. i totally admire the respect you guys have for each other (seeing how some people love to rip nic apart). i just love being here. thanks foxy for doing such a great job (and the other members too!). it's our very own nic sanctuary i hope to be more active here and i wish nicole the very best- we all know she deserves it!

Awesome!! Thanks Skanky!! I am way excited for this movie!!!! I can't WAIT!!!

OMG Skanky thank u so much 4 da stills I da first picture Nic looks so sweet

~Viviana~

Thanks, Skanky!

wow great pics! I cant wait till the movie comes out!!!!!! THANKS! (O=

thanks so much skanky!!


welcome to NKU kiki!!

Welcome, kiki .

awww thanks guys! everytime i go to this board i feel so much lighter. it's family! i just wish we all can go to nic's wedding. i'm so happy and excited i wish it was the weekend

sparkling and amazing 30 minutes

Thanks Skanky for the Fur's pictures.

Thanks Skanky ....but I think there's one photo missing. I saw them on another site linking to the same website as yours but I can't seem to find it on your link. I'm trying to remember where I saw it.

Thanks for the tip, Wiggle, an additional pic has been added to the first post .

Thanks for the photos

thank you!!!!

wow! i love the stills! ♥ thanx so much skanky

oh, thank you so much, skanky!! you are a star!--->
i particularly love the one of nic with children - she looks so innocent & cute!!

Thanks soooooooo much for the new pics, i can't wait to see this film!!!

this persone has seen fur today:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0422295/board/thread/46410197

"It's a very interesting, unusual movie. The best part, I thought, were the visuals - but I actually wanted to see more of Arbus' work rather than the beginnings of it. Nicole was good (although you don't really get past that this is Nicole Kidman playing Diane Arbus), Robert Downey Jr. was very fun. The main problem that I had with the writing is that it doesn't really give you much insight into Arbus herself. The main character could be anyone, really. "

Good, good, I am liking what I'm reading. I hope they make it clear that it is a fictional or imaginary portrait. I can't wait .

Thanks nicfan22 .

How could this person have seen Fur?
I mean it´s not in theaters yet, is it?

Well assuming he has seen it, it´s not really a good critic.
It says Nicole doesn´t disappear behind Diane and you can see she is playing her. That´s a very harsh critic, especially as it´s Nicole´s specialty to totally get lost in a character!

There are several people who have seen FUR as it was being worked on by the filmmakers, it is just a private screening.

Thanx Nicfan22

~Viviana~

The comment about the viewer always being aware of Nicole being Nicole might be an entirely personal and subjective thing - another viewer might disagree, so we shall be able to judge for ourselves soon enough. (I honestly had problems "not" seeing Nicole when watching Cold Mountain, whereas I never saw anyone but Virginia when watching The Hours. At first when watching The Human Stain I was distracted out by surfaces - the lipgloss, certain incongruities - and then as the film went on for me the performance just took over and I was swept up in Faunia's rage completely.)

I think the person was stating their opinion in an entirely respectful manner, anna. A good and truly dedicated artist can take constructive criticism in the spirit in which it's intended - to learn and grow next time around. This person has posted a balanced review (preview), stating what worked for them and what didn't. That to me is a good critic. A "bad" critic, to me, is one who is unhelpful, overly emotional, who attacks the artists or the subject and makes no attempt to meet it halfway, to understand what the filmmaker is trying to say. I see none of that here.

I agree with you that it is her specialty to get "lost" in characters, but she is human and is not going to connect with every character she plays with equal success. (She admitted as much in the interviews for The Stepford Wives - that Joanna was a character she had great difficulty "putting on".) That's part of what makes her filmography so interesting - I'd say we're all dedicated Nicole fans (if we're members of this board) but we don't all like the same films equally. we won't be touched or not by the same performances in the same way.

Oh with bad critic I just meant that it wasn´t all positive and complimentary.
I also think it seemed like a profound critic.
And you´re also right about seeing Nicole in her characters sometimes.
I never saw her in The Hours as well, but I saw her in Birthday Girl when she was sweet and seductive at the same time, but I think that doesn´t mean she was bad at acting, it just means that certain aspects of the character are also part of Nicole´s character.
I think with Virginia she had really nothing in common except for sometimes feeling very heavy-hearted and depressed!

And yeah I am definitley for constructive criticism as well.
Now I am really excited to what extent WE will see Nicole in Diane!

When it comes to movies especially biopics, especially when the biopic is about someone who passed on a century ago or was never accessible in such a way that people knew his or her personality, I always find it amusing when people say an actor didn't embody a character and you could tell that it was an actor playing a character rather than being the character. For me as a viewer, the most an actor can do is give a good honest performance that sweeps the viewer along. And as this reviewer said, NK was good.

I very rarely see Nicole as Nicole in her characters, so much so, the avatars of her characters are driving me crazy. The other day I was watching the start of a montage (can't remember which one) and the picture from Red's avatar appeared and the first thought that came into my mind was,"what's Red doing in this!" :

Foxy's old avatar used to throw me as well....to me that was Foxy and not Nicole.

ETA...it's the stare.

I may have not been clear regarding my opinion of her performance in the Hours, anna, my apoligies for trying to be too clever. What I meant to say was just the opposite of how you felt - I never saw Nicole in that movie (except for a split-second when her eyes widened and her voice rose a fraction of an octave closer to her natural voice while speaking with Leonard while he sat at the breakfast table.) I only saw Virginia, and any parallel between the two women did not occur to me at the time. As skanky said, the thing of it is to be swept along by the performance. The Hours did it for me, but didn't do it for you, both opinions are valid. On the other hand "Birthday Girl" did it for both of us. C'est la vie. Sometimes the best performances an actor can give are as a character least like themselves. Again, I wasn't trying to see Nicole or an aspect of her in the performance of Nadia, or any other character. I don't want to. I want to be "in the moment", as I'm sure you do too. Later on, after I've left the theater and had time to reflect, I admit the temptation to look back, analyze and try to match the performance to the person is irresistable to me. Probably bad of me, I'm sure, although Nicole's choices seem to invite such comparisons more than any current actor I can think of, in part because she seems to choose her roles through intuition and emotion, via her heart more than her head.