QUOTE(skankyoldwhore @ Jul 1 2006, 07:44 AM)
Nicolefan17, Fur is not a biopic, it is an imaginary tale on Diane Arbus, it is not telling the whole story of Diane Arbus per se, they've created a whole other dimension to it. And from all that has been written about it, it seems to be more similar to her more quirky and darker work than traditional biopics, people who have seen it consider it to be something AMPAS doesn't usually go for.
Oh I know that, it may be an unconventional biopic but does it still not have the real person aspect to it? And if the subject matter isn't considered taboo, the academy HAS given some big cat. nominations to films, if they are actually good(which Fur looks like it's going to be), just look at Being John Malkovich(it got into some big cat. despite being considered 'odd') and Mullholand Dr.(hardly any big precursor love and it still got a Best Director nomination). It may be likely that Fur isn't getting like a BP nomination or anything, but it has a HUGE chance to get into acting and screenplay cat.
